A Place to Talk About War

I would like to hear from soldiers who have been in combat situations, from their families, or from others interested in this conversation. I am a graduate student interested in war rhetoric. I have no preset agenda: I simply want to listen, to learn, and to be supportive.

Name:
Location: Texas, United States

Married, two kids. Worked in the defense industry for 20 years before taking a different path. I'll be starting my dissertation on the rhetoric of war in a few months. This semester I am teaching Freshman Composition. I DON'T CARE ABOUT BLOGGERS' SPELLING, PUNCTUATION, OR ANY OTHER GRAMMAR MATTERS--I JUST WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU.

Monday, March 28, 2005

Why the military uses down-range spotters

PLEASANT GROVE — Scott and Lori Connors' family room looks like it was bombed. There are random holes in the walls, gashes in the fabric of the couch and chair. There's broken glass everywhere and a sheet of plywood where the window used to be.
Outside, a shed is in tatters, and there's a boulder-size crater in the lawn. Upstairs, there are pieces of shrapnel imbedded in the bathroom wall. A large mirror has what looks like bullet holes in the glass.
It looks like it was bombed — because it was. A 105mm howitzer shell fired near Sundance in Provo Canyon overshot its mark and landed with a bang in the Conners' back yard. The boom was heard over several blocks.
Debris from the 3 p.m. explosion Wednesday also damaged a car across the street from the Connors' home and two other houses in the vicinity of 1600 East and 500 South on the Pleasant Grove bench.
It was a miracle no one was killed or injured, said Scott Connors.
"If the school bus had just been a minute or two earlier, kids would have been walking in the street where the shrapnel went across," Connors said.
The Connors' 3-year-old son was lying on the family room floor watching television when the mortar exploded. If he had raised his head or if he'd been standing, he would have been in the path of several bits of deadly flying shrapnel. As it was, he was covered in broken glass and badly frightened, say his parents.
"He's telling everybody, 'Our house exploded!' " said Lori Connors. Lori Connors chokes up when she thinks about it. "Every time I walk downstairs, I think, "What if?' " she said. "We figure it was a minor miracle. No. It wasn't minor," said Scott Connors.
Utah Department of Transportation officials, who have taken responsibility for the errant mortar, say the event is a rarity, even though they set off 560 rounds of explosive material every year in an attempt to control avalanche danger in the Provo, American Fork, Big and Little Cottonwood canyons.
"Of the tens of thousands of blasts done in Utah, there are extremely few incidents like this," said Liam Fitzgerald, supervisor for the Avalanche Safety Program in UDOT's Region 2. "This one was recorded as a dud because the crew did not see or hear an explosion," Fitzgerald said. Fitzgerald said the cannon was fired from a fixed launch site on the north side of Provo Canyon — a spot above Sundance — that's been used many times before.
"Most of our firing is done when we cannot see the target," he said. "That's when we have avalanches, when it's storming." The blast was at least 3 miles off course. Avalanche-control operations are being temporarily suspended in Provo Canyon until officials can determine how the accident happened.
UDOT blames the misfire on too much gunpowder. UDOT spokesman Geoff DuPaix said the shells come pre-packaged in bundles, so it isn't clear who is responsible for using the larger charge.
Carlos Braceras, UDOT deputy director, said UDOT takes responsibility for the accident and wants to make certain it doesn't happen again. Exact damage estimates are still coming in, but it could reach $100,000. "We obviously have a little bit of work to do here," he said.
Investigators for the Federal Bureau of Investigation were initially called to the scene until it was determined no terrorist or malicious intent was involved. "We were actually relieved to find it was so random, not a targeted event against us," Connors said. Connors said insurance investigators are trying to estimate the extent of the damage, and UDOT Executive Director John Njord has promised Thursday that the department would do what it can to restore things. Meanwhile, the Utah County Sheriff's Office is continuing to investigate the exact cause of the overshoot, and the Connors are collecting shrapnel and counting their blessings.
"You just don't think you'll have a bomb in the back yard," said Lori Connors. "It's just not something you think you have to worry about."

Friday, March 25, 2005

President silent on Native American shootings

I received this in email today, so I don't have the original citation. I do think it bears thought and discussion.

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. - Native Americans across the country -- including tribal leaders, academics and rank-and-file tribe members -- voiced anger and frustration Thursday that President Bush has responded to the second-deadliest school shooting in U.S. history with silence.

'Very telling' response
The reaction to Bush's silence was particularly bitter given his high-profile, late-night intervention on behalf of Terri Schiavo, the brain-damaged Florida woman caught in a legal battle over whether her feeding tube should be reinserted. "The fact that Bush preempted his vacation to say something about Ms. Schiavo and here you have 10 native people gunned down and he can't take time to speak is very telling," said David Wilkins, interim chairman of the
Department of American Indian Studies at the University of Minnesota and a member of the North Carolina-based Lumbee tribe.

Wednesday, March 23, 2005

Read This Only if You are Going to Die Someday

If you believe that you will not live forever--that the physical laws of the universe do indeed apply to you--then please show some love for the people who will outlive you by doing the following:
  • Make a will. It can be as simple as writing on a piece of paper that you leave all of your earthly goods to your spouse, or as elaborate as hiring an attorney to set up various trust accounts. The amount that you own and your family situation (divorce, stepchildren, etc.) will dictate how you need to proceed.
  • Talk to your family about end-of-life issues. Ideally, have an attorney draw up a living will for you, along with an advance health care directive. If you can't afford an attorney, write out your wishes on a piece of paper; or, have someone videotape you while you talk about how you want to be treated if issues of life support and pain management become applicable to you. Be honest: if you want life support to be continued for as long as your family can afford it, say so; if you absolutely do not want to be resuscitated if your heart ever stops, say that, as well. This is not about what's right for other people--it's about what's right for you.
  • Draw up a durable Power of Attorney. This gives the person you name the legal standing to speak for you in case you can't speak for yourself. An attorney can prepare this for you; you may also be able to do it yourself with the proper forms. Think carefully about who you choose: most people choose their spouses, but if you believe that your spouse would be too emotionally distraught to think clearly, or that s/he might not operate in your best interest, then you can choose someone else: a parent, a sibling, a close friend.
  • Review the above documents every five years, or whenever you have a major life change: birth of a child, death of a spouse, divorce, remarriage, etc. Things change--make sure that the directives you leave accurately portray your wishes.

Preparing these things is not difficult, particularly when compared to the difficulties your family will go through if you don't make your wishes known. Show them you love them--just do it.

Monday, March 21, 2005

Trip to San Francisco

I'm back from a professional trip to San Francisco, my first visit to that city. I just missed an anti-war march--the group planned to parade through the Union Square area where I was staying, but they started one hour after I left for the airport.

I did sit beside a nice gentleman on one leg of the flight home who works for an airline whose primary job is to shuttle soldiers to and from Iraq; his basic route is Ft. Still, OK; Bangor, ME; Frankfurt; Kuwait. He seemed to enjoy his job a lot.

This is the first trip I can remember in several years in which I did not see any soldiers in uniform in the airport, and I was in three of them in California--San Francisco, John Wayne, and LAX.

If you need recommendations for Chinese or Italian restaurants in San Francisco, I've got them!

Sunday, March 13, 2005

War Movies

What I've watched in the last week:
  • Dr. Strangelove (Or How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb)
  • The Atomic Cafe
  • The Manchurian Candidate (with Frank Sinatra)

It's been quite an experience.

Monday, March 07, 2005

Shooting the Italian Hostage

Well, by now everyone has heard about the incident in which American troops fired on the car carrying the recently freed Italian hostage. (If not, read it here.) I know there will be an investigation; I know that we want the Americans to have, in fact, acted properly; I know that the Left will be accused of hating America if they criticize any facet of the U.S. military over this incident.

Here's my question: the story told by Giuliana Sgrena, the freed hostage, contradicts the story told by American soldiers. What reason would we have for believing that she is lying? Granted, there are multiple sides to every story, and we understand that the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle of all of them. We know that American soldiers for the greatest part perform admirably and honorably; we also know that honest mistakes happen in war, and that unfortunately every barrel has a bad apple or two.

I'd like to hear your comments on this. I'm hoping for a discussion that goes beyond "the U.S. is always right!" or "War is always evil!" Sgrena is the one who was shot and whose rescuer died on top of her, saving her life. What good reasons do I have for believing, or not, her story?

Thursday, March 03, 2005

Syrian comments and WMD

I heard a Syrian government spokesman interviewed yesterday on NPR. I confess little knowledge on Syrian involvement in terrorism, but his comments were pretty much what one would expect him to say: "we do not sponsor or tolerate terrorism; we have repeatedly told the U.S. that we are open to dialogue with them [when did dialogue become a verb?] on this topic; if they find any proof of terrorist activity among our people or in our borders and will come show us that proof instead of taking the case to the media, we will immediately take swift, severe action against the guilty parties. "

But here was the kicker: "This sounds very much like the U.S. run-up to invading Iraq, in which assertions were made without any proof, and which turned out to be patently false" (my paraphrase of his comments). I wonder for how many decades "WMD in Iraq" will be held up as the paradigm of American intelligence/posturing/rationalizing/willful blindness/etc. (Please don't dredge back up the arguments of whether we should have entered Iraq or not--that is not the point of this post. I'm simply wondering how long the non-WMD will be the lens through which America is viewed.)

And a quick question which I could find out with a little time but I'm hoping someone who knows will just answer for me: are today's Syrians the descendants of the ancient Assyrians?